Total Ankle Replacement

Total Ankle Replacement
OrthoJOE
Total Ankle Replacement
/
Episode 9 April 12, 2021 00:16:01

Hosted By

Mohit Bhandari, MD Marc Swiontkowski, MD

Show Notes

In this episode, Marc and Mo are joined by special guest Bruce Sangeorzan—Professor of Orthopaedics at the University of Washington and world-renowned foot and ankle researcher—in a lively discussion on the past, present, and future of ankle replacement.  

  • Approximately 700,000 knee replacements are performed each year, compared with just 10,000-20,000 ankle replacements, leading to a number of questions:
    • How does this factor affect the number of clinicians who are as skillful and comfortable in performing ankle replacement as compared with shoulder, knee, and hip replacement?
    • How do better-designed alignment devices, improved implants, and better training affect the numbers of ankle replacements being performed each year?
    • How soon can we reach 40,000 ankle replacements each year?
  • What are the challenges in performing RCTs of ankle arthroplasty? Is an RCT even the right study design for this topic?
  • What design elements seem to be most successful, especially given the space limitations in the ankle region?
  • How do factors such as degenerative disease, BMI, activity level, and adjacent osteotomy affect the results of ankle replacement and arthrodesis? 

OrthoJOE Mailbag: feedback, comments, and suggestions from our audience can be sent to [email protected]

Resources/Links:

Brought to you by Mohit Bhandari and Marc Swiontkowski of OrthoJOE.

Other Episodes

Episode cover

June 21, 2021

Cannabinoids in Orthopaedic Research (with special guest Jason Busse)

Orthopaedic patients are increasingly using cannabinoids for pain relief, but there is a lack of evidence-based data on this topic. In this episode, Marc and Mo are joined by special guest Jason Busse (Associate Professor in the Department of Anesthesia at McMaster University, Director of the National Pain Centre, and Associate Director of the Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Medicinal Cannabis Research) in an illuminating discussion on the issues, opportunities, and challenges related to orthopaedic research into the use of cannabinoids. Some of the questions covered during the discussion include:   What are the most popular claims among cannabis proponents? What evidence is there to support these claims? Is there a causal relationship between cannabinoid use and decreased use of opioids and other prescription medications (i.e., a “substitution effect”)?  Much of the current evidence on cannabinoids is observational and anecdotal. What can we learn from this evidence, and how can such information inform future research?  What are the possible sources of funding for such research? What legal and regulatory hurdles must be overcome in order to allow us to perform properly designed RCTs into this topic? What challenges are faced by physicians when asked by patients about cannabinoids? What research is being done from the patient perspective? What is the roadmap for the future? How we will obtain quality evidence that will help clinicians and their patients to make decisions that are consistent with their values and preferences?    OrthoJOE Mailbag: feedback, comments, and suggestions ...

Play

00:24:29

Episode cover

August 30, 2021

Rehabilitation Strategies: Evidence is the Oasis

In this episode, Marc and Mo discuss the importance of breaking down silos and collaborating with non-surgeon colleagues in the musculoskeletal arena (PTs, OTs, physiatrists) to develop evidence-based recommendations on rehabilitation strategies for the purpose of improving patient outcomes. OrthoJOE Mailbag: feedback, comments, and suggestions from our audience can be sent to [email protected] Links: Martínez R, Santana F, Pardo A, Torrens C. One Versus 3-Week Immobilization Period for Nonoperatively Treated Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Aug 18;103(16):1491-1498. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.02137. PMID: 34101691. https://bit.ly/2WhQSh1 ...

Play

00:11:44

Episode cover

March 29, 2021

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

How do diversity, equity, and inclusion contribute to excellence, creativity, competitive advantage, and relevance in both orthopaedic surgery and scientific publishing? How can we achieve greater diversity among authors, editors, and reviewers at top journals? What specific steps can individuals and organizations take to create a more diverse, inclusive, and equitable environment that provides greater opportunities for under-represented groups?  We have a mailbag! If you have any feedback or comments about the latest episode or other relevant topics, feel free to send us a line at the OrthoJOE Mailbag: [email protected]   Talking Points: Equity and inequality in surgery “Getting to excellence” and “being diverse and inclusive” are key targets How can we be more inclusive in the publishing industry and within our fields of expertise? The orthopaedic gender gap What more should we be doing? Rallying the voices of others Being aware of what’s happening in your office Thinking broadly about change Resources/Links: Scholl E, Badwall HK, Bhandari M. Equity in Surgery: Being Diverse and Inclusive, Isn’t Enough. OE Insights. Sept. 5, 2020. https://myorthoevidence.com/Download/5ac93c79-38a3-4e9e-b5bc-ce225882ac75.  Okike K, Liu B, Lin YB, Torpey JL, Kocher MS, Mehlman CT, Bhandari M, Biermann JS. The orthopedic gender gap: trends in authorship and editorial board representation over the past 4 decades. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012 Jul;41(7):304-10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22893880/ Hiller KP, Boulos A, Tran MM, Cruz AI Jr. What Are the Rates and Trends of Women Authors in ...

Play

00:21:43